Plymouth Marjon University is an inclusive community that values sound learning, new discovery and the pursuit of wisdom for the good of all. In doing so it seeks to apply the highest ethical standards at all levels of decision making, especially taking into account how these decisions might affect others and the natural world. As such, we uphold academic freedom and high ethical, scientific and professional standards. The Ethical Review Process is a cornerstone of such decision-making and praxis in the research context.
Research is a step into the unknown. As a result, seeking unrevealed understanding often presents a range of risks. Some are trivial. Others profound.
The Ethical Review Process is designed to facilitate excellence in the pursuit of knowledge by helping researchers to identify such risks as well as ethical issues in the design, conduct and oversight of research. This enables researchers to develop reasoned and ethically defensible responses to these issues so that they may conduct their research while protecting themselves, their participants, colleagues, environment, and the University.
The University Research Ethics Panel is currently made up of:
Read the Research Ethics Panel Terms of Reference
Our Student Ethics Standard Operating Procedure describes the procedures for undergraduate and taught postgraduate research projects. These procedures take effect from academic year 2018-19 onwards.
All undergraduate and postgraduate taught student applications should be submitted to their supervisors in the first instance, not the University Ethics Panel.
Researchers are advised to submit an ethics application well in advance of their anticipated start date.
The following deadlines and response timelines relate to staff and PGR students only.
Please note the caveat attached to our light touch ethics review: light touch applications are assigned as such based on the answers and justification provided within the Research Ethics Application. However, the light touch review panel reserves the right to escalate an application to the next full panel review if a light touch is deemed inappropriate.
Our Ethics policy supports the values and ideas of the Concordat to Support Research Integrity UK.
All forms and guidance documents can be found below:
Refer to the following links and guidance:
Service evaluation, audit and research: what is the difference?
The Concordat to Support Research Integrity